City of Douglas v. Union Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

City of Douglas v. Union Banking Co.

177 S.E. 595, 179 Ga. 798, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 408

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 19, 1934

DocketNo. 10331

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 177 S.E. 595 (City of Douglas v. Union Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Douglas v. Union Banking Co., 177 S.E. 595, 179 Ga. 798, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 408 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

The last amendment did not materially change the petition as considered with prior amendments respectively in Union Banking Co. v. City of Douglas, 175 Ga. 82 (165 S. E. 54), and 177 Ga. 637 (171 S. E. 131). It follows that under these decisions, which have become the law of the case, the court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition as finally amended.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concwr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

The last amendment did not materially change the petition as considered with prior amendments respectively in Union Banking Co. v. City of Douglas, 175 Ga. 82 (165 S. E. 54), and 177 Ga. 637 (171 S. E. 131). It follows that under these decisions, which have become the law of the case, the court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition as finally amended.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concwr.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 S.E. 595, 179 Ga. 798, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-douglas-v-union-banking-co-ga-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack