City of Dothan v. Carroll Ben Powell, Jr.
This text of City of Dothan v. Carroll Ben Powell, Jr. (City of Dothan v. Carroll Ben Powell, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rel: March 17, 2023
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter.
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 2022-2023
_________________________
SC-2022-0767 _________________________
City of Dothan
v.
Carroll Ben Powell, Jr.
Appeal from Dale Circuit Court (CV-19-900102)
MENDHEIM, Justice.
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(E), Ala. R. App. P. SC-2022-0767
Shaw, Wise, Bryan, Sellers, Stewart, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.
Parker, C.J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion,
which Cook, J., joins.
2 SC-2022-0767
PARKER, Chief Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in affirming the summary judgment in favor of Carroll Ben
Powell, Jr., with regard to the City of Dothan's public-nuisance claim. I
dissent from affirming the judgment in favor of Powell on the City of
Dothan's interference-with-easement claim. I would reverse the
judgment as to that claim.
Cook, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
City of Dothan v. Carroll Ben Powell, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-dothan-v-carroll-ben-powell-jr-ala-2023.