City of Detroit v. Thomas
744 N.W.2d 158, 480 Mich. 1076
This text of 744 N.W.2d 158 (City of Detroit v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Detroit v. Thomas, 744 N.W.2d 158, 480 Mich. 1076 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
CITY OF DETROIT, dba Planning and Economic Development, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James B. THOMAS, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff/Appellee, and
Glenn Arthur and Chanty Arthur, Defendants/Cross Defendants/Appellees and
Citibank NA, Defendant/Cross Plaintiff/Appellee and
Citifinancial NA, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
744 N.W.2d 158, 480 Mich. 1076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-detroit-v-thomas-mich-2008.