City of Detroit v. Morgan

162 N.W.2d 104, 11 Mich. App. 656, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1358
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 1968·No. Docket No. 3,567·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals her conviction for violating an ordinance of tbe city of Detroit. [657] A review of the record demonstrates that defendant was denied a fair trial because she was denied right of cross-examination and an opportunity to produce a witness, but the record does not establish that defendant is entitled to have the charge against her dismissed as requested by defendant on this appeal.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. Gillis, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Detroit v. Morgan, 162 N.W.2d 104, 11 Mich. App. 656, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1358 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

162 N.W.2d 104 (City of Detroit v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gilliam
45 A.D.2d 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)