City of Detroit v. DETROIT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
733 N.W.2d 42, 478 Mich. 925
This text of 733 N.W.2d 42 (City of Detroit v. DETROIT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Detroit v. DETROIT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 733 N.W.2d 42, 478 Mich. 925 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DETROIT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-Appellee, and
Bank One Michigan, J & J Slavik, Inc., James D. Blain, Beztak II Limited Partnership, Griswold Holding Company, McCarthy Marine, Inc. Detroit Bulk Storage, Inc., and Mayfair Associates Limited Partnership, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Tillman
733 N.W.2d 42 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
733 N.W.2d 42, 478 Mich. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-detroit-v-detroit-plaza-limited-partnership-mich-2007.