City of Detroit v. Caudill

161 N.W.2d 766, 11 Mich. App. 567, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1326
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 31, 1968
DocketDocket No. 3,199
StatusPublished

This text of 161 N.W.2d 766 (City of Detroit v. Caudill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Detroit v. Caudill, 161 N.W.2d 766, 11 Mich. App. 567, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1326 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

Martin Ray Caudill was convicted by a judge of the traffic and ordinance division of Detroit recorder’s court of driving in violation of a City of Detroit ordinance. He was sentenced to pay a fine of $25 or to serve 5 days in the Detroit bouse of correction. He appeals.

An examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error and evidence sufficient to support the finding of guilt. The findings of the trial judge are not clearly erroneous. GrCR 1963, 517.1, 785.1(1).

Affirmed.

Levin, P. J. and Burns and Dalton, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 N.W.2d 766, 11 Mich. App. 567, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-detroit-v-caudill-michctapp-1968.