City of Detroit v. AMBASSADOR BRIDGE COMPANY
735 N.W.2d 215, 2007 WL 2164608
This text of 735 N.W.2d 215 (City of Detroit v. AMBASSADOR BRIDGE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Detroit v. AMBASSADOR BRIDGE COMPANY, 735 N.W.2d 215, 2007 WL 2164608 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee,
v.
AMBASSADOR BRIDGE COMPANY a/k/a Detroit International Bridge Company, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for admission pro hac vice of David H. Coburn, Alice E. Loughran, Catherine B. Sevcenko, and Richard K. Willard is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss this appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the appeal is moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
735 N.W.2d 215, 2007 WL 2164608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-detroit-v-ambassador-bridge-company-mich-2007.