City of Detroit v. 17526 RIOPELLE
735 N.W.2d 271, 479 Mich. 860
Opinion
CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
17526 RIOPELLE and Acorn Investment, Defendants, and
Occupant, Andrea Campbell Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Detroit v. 17526 RIOPELLE, 735 N.W.2d 271, 479 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2007).
735 N.W.2d 271 (City of Detroit v. 17526 RIOPELLE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Treasurer of Wayne County
735 N.W.2d 271 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)