City of Detroit v. 17526 RIOPELLE
735 N.W.2d 271, 479 Mich. 860
This text of 735 N.W.2d 271 (City of Detroit v. 17526 RIOPELLE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Detroit v. 17526 RIOPELLE, 735 N.W.2d 271, 479 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
17526 RIOPELLE and Acorn Investment, Defendants, and
Occupant, Andrea Campbell Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Treasurer of Wayne County
735 N.W.2d 271 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
735 N.W.2d 271, 479 Mich. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-detroit-v-17526-riopelle-mich-2007.