City of Denver v. Marselis

29 Colo. 79
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1901
DocketNo. 4153
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 Colo. 79 (City of Denver v. Marselis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Denver v. Marselis, 29 Colo. 79 (Colo. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was commenced by appellee to recover from the city on an alleged money demand. From a judgment in his favor, the city appealed to the court of appeals. By stipulation of parties the cause has been transferred from that tribunal.

[80]*80The sole question presented for determination is, whether or not appellee is entitled to recover the judgment rendered by the trial court. No questions involving a franchise, freehold, or the construction of a provision of the constitution of this state or of the United States are presented. The judgment is for less than the jurisdictional amount. Under the law regulating appeals this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Mills Ann. Code § 406a; Laws 1899, p. 172. Hence, under the law regulating the transfer of causes from the court of appeals to the supreme court, a cause cannot be transferred unless the supreme court can take jurisdiction under the procedure by which it was taken to the court of appeals.

Litch v. People, 28 Colo. 480; 65 Pac. Rep. 633; McCarthy v. Crump, 28 Colo. 398; 65 Pac. Rep. 49.

The cause must be remanded to the court of appeals, and it is so ordered.

Remanded to the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Denver v. Marselis
67 Colo. 364 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Colo. 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-denver-v-marselis-colo-1901.