City of Denver v. Marselis

29 Colo. 79
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 15, 1901·No. No. 4153·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was commenced by appellee to recover from the city on an alleged money demand. From a judgment in his favor, the city appealed to the court of appeals. By stipulation of parties the cause has been transferred from that tribunal.

[80]*80The sole question presented for determination is, whether or not appellee is entitled to recover the judgment rendered by the trial court. No questions involving a franchise, freehold, or the construction of a provision of the constitution of this state or of the United States are presented. The judgment is for less than the jurisdictional amount. Under the law regulating appeals this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Mills Ann. Code § 406a; Laws 1899, p. 172. Hence, under the law regulating the transfer of causes from the court of appeals to the supreme court, a cause cannot be transferred unless the supreme court can take jurisdiction under the procedure by which it was taken to the court of appeals.

Litch v. People, 28 Colo. 480; 65 Pac. Rep. 633; McCarthy v. Crump, 28 Colo. 398; 65 Pac. Rep. 49.

The cause must be remanded to the court of appeals, and it is so ordered.

Remanded to the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Denver v. Marselis, 29 Colo. 79 (Colo. 1901).

29 Colo. 79 (City of Denver v. Marselis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Denver v. Marselis
67 Colo. 364 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1919)