City of Denver v. Hamilton

Colorado Court of Appeals

City of Denver v. Hamilton

8 Colo. App. 392

DecidedSeptember 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Colo. App. 392 (City of Denver v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Denver v. Hamilton, 8 Colo. App. 392 (Colo. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are the same as in the City of Denver v. Johnson, ante, p. 384. Both parties were in the same wagon and received injuries in precisely the same way. The cases were tried together, but, of necessity, separate judgments were entered. In this case the judgment was |250, from which a separate appeal was taken. The decision in this case must be the same as in the former.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are the same as in the City of Denver v. Johnson, ante, p. 384. Both parties were in the same wagon and received injuries in precisely the same way. The cases were tried together, but, of necessity, separate judgments were entered. In this case the judgment was |250, from which a separate appeal was taken. The decision in this case must be the same as in the former.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Colo. App. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-denver-v-hamilton-coloctapp-1896.