City of Delaware v. State ex rel. Wolfley, Marnell, Williams & Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

City of Delaware v. State ex rel. Wolfley, Marnell, Williams & Co.

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 5, 1916

DocketNo. 15291

StatusPublished

This text of 95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402 (City of Delaware v. State ex rel. Wolfley, Marnell, Williams & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Delaware v. State ex rel. Wolfley, Marnell, Williams & Co., 95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402 (Ohio 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The court finds from the entry of the final judgment of the court of appeals, as shown by the record herein, the cause was submitted to that court upon the statement and admissions of counsel for respondents in the statement of the case and upon the motion of the relators for a judgment upon the pleadings and the statement and admissions of counsel, and the court further finds that there is not contained in the record of the cause any bill of exceptions showing what the statements and admissions of counsel for respondents in the statement of the case were, and there ■ is not included in the entry of the judgment such statement and admissions of counsel for the respondents in the statement of the case.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this [403]*403court that the judgment of said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. ■

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The court finds from the entry of the final judgment of the court of appeals, as shown by the record herein, the cause was submitted to that court upon the statement and admissions of counsel for respondents in the statement of the case and upon the motion of the relators for a judgment upon the pleadings and the statement and admissions of counsel, and the court further finds that there is not contained in the record of the cause any bill of exceptions showing what the statements and admissions of counsel for respondents in the statement of the case were, and there ■ is not included in the entry of the judgment such statement and admissions of counsel for the respondents in the statement of the case.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this [403]*403court that the judgment of said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. ■

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-delaware-v-state-ex-rel-wolfley-marnell-williams-co-ohio-1916.