City of Deland v. Fearington

146 So. 573, 108 Fla. 498
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 146 So. 573 (City of Deland v. Fearington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Deland v. Fearington, 146 So. 573, 108 Fla. 498 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a decree restraining the holding of referendum election authorized by Chapter 15177 Laws of Florida, Acts of 1931. It is contended by Appellees that a referendum election may be restrained, that Chapter 15177, Acts of 1931 was not legally enacted, that the election provided for thereunder was not legally called, that Chapter 15177 Acts of 1931 was repealed by Chapter 15673 Acts of 1931, that Chapter 15177 Acts of 1931 was a flagrant violation of property rights, and that this case is ruled by State s. City of Stuart 97 Fla. 69, 120 So. 335.

A court of equity will not as a general rule restrain the holding of an election but there are some well known exceptions to this rule. An election held in violation of law or contrary to well established legal requirements or when it would result in substantial injury to any suitor or the public generally may on proper showing be enjoined where there is no other legal remedy.

State v. City of Stuart has no application whatever to this case. Neither is there any basis for the contention that. Chapter 15177 Acts of 1931 was repealed by Chapter 15673, Acts of 1931. The Chancellor refused to adjudicate the validity of Chapter 15177 but restrained the holding of the election on the theory that the law. providing for its holding was not complied with. There is ample showing in the record to restrain the election but a discussion of the grounds on which it should have been restrained would serve *500 no useful purpose as the time in which it was required to be held has long since passed.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miami Heat Ltd. Partnership v. Leahy
682 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Florida League of Cities v. Smith
607 So. 2d 397 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Hull v. Hillsborough County
43 Fla. Supp. 2d 207 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1990)
Wilson v. Dade County
369 So. 2d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Rivergate Rest. Corp. v. METRO. DADE CTY.
369 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Metropolitan Dade County v. Shiver
365 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Berman v. Airlift International, Inc.
302 F. Supp. 1203 (N.D. Georgia, 1969)
Treadwell v. Town of Oak Hill
175 So. 2d 777 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1965)
Dreger v. Mallard
23 Fla. Supp. 43 (Duval County Circuit Court, 1964)
Klein v. Newburger, Loeb & Co.
151 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Senior Citizens Protective League, Inc. v. McNayr
132 So. 2d 237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Dulaney v. City of Miami Beach
96 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Kight v. American Eagle Fire Insurance
179 So. 792 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Gulf Coast Title Co. v. Walters
168 So. 537 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Beckwith v. Bailey
161 So. 576 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
City of Miami v. Bopp
158 So. 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
G. Lloyd Preacher & Co. v. Sarasota Bay Hotel Co.
150 So. 590 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 So. 573, 108 Fla. 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-deland-v-fearington-fla-1933.