City of Daytona Beach v. State Ex Rel. Clegg

167 So. 415, 123 Fla. 470
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 415 (City of Daytona Beach v. State Ex Rel. Clegg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Daytona Beach v. State Ex Rel. Clegg, 167 So. 415, 123 Fla. 470 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error from a judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus requiring respondents, City of Daytona Beach and its officers, to levy taxes for the payment of certain delinquent “Improvement Bonds.”

The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of City of Palmetto v. Klemm, 108 Fla. 455, 146 Sou. 588, without prejudice, however, to the amendment of the alternative writ and the peremptory writ so as to make the same apply to the current assessment roll and to the present officers of the respondent municipality.

So ordered.

*471 Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Palmetto v. Klemm
146 So. 558 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 415, 123 Fla. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-daytona-beach-v-state-ex-rel-clegg-fla-1936.