City of Dayton v. Ferrugia, Unpublished Decision (3-1-2002)
Opinion
On appeal, Ferrugia advances a single assignment of error: The trial court erred by convicting appellant due to the fact that Mr. Tamme failed to swear to the original citation.
The Mr. Tamme referred to in the assignment of error is the housing inspector who issued the citation to Ferrugia. The parties agree that Akron v. Meissner (1993),
Notwithstanding Ferrugia's contention that Mr. Tamme failed to file a sworn original citation with the court, an examination of the documents filed with the court belies this contention. A citation signed by Mr. Tamme and bearing a jurat demonstrating that it was sworn and subscribed December 7, 2000, before Denver A. Williams is contained in the original documents of the court and bears a file-stamp of December 7, 2000, at 9:20 a.m.
Accordingly, there is no merit to Ferrugia's assignment of error which is hereby overruled. The judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
GRADY, J. and YOUNG, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Dayton v. Ferrugia, Unpublished Decision (3-1-2002) (City of Dayton v. Ferrugia, Unpublished Decision (3-1-2002)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.