City of Dardenne Prairie v. Cora Bopp Ltd. Partnership

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of Dardenne Prairie v. Cora Bopp Ltd. Partnership

323 S.W.3d 64, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1181, 2010 WL 3478260

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 2010·No. ED 93590·Published

Opinion

*65 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of O’Fallon appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a consent judgment between the City of Dard-enne Prairie and the Cora Bopp Limited Partnership (the Partnership) involving the determination of competing annexation claims over property owned by the Partnership.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*65 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The City of O’Fallon appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a consent judgment between the City of Dard-enne Prairie and the Cora Bopp Limited Partnership (the Partnership) involving the determination of competing annexation claims over property owned by the Partnership.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

City of Dardenne Prairie v. Cora Bopp Ltd. Partnership, 323 S.W.3d 64, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1181, 2010 WL 3478260 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

323 S.W.3d 64 (City of Dardenne Prairie v. Cora Bopp Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.