City of Danbury v. Falvo
This text of 94 A.2d 10 (City of Danbury v. Falvo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts in this ease are similar to these in Danbury v. Corbett, decided this day, and the identical legal question is presented. The decision in that case impels a like decision in this one.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendants.
In this opinion Jennings and O’Sullivan Js., concurred; Brown, C. J., and Inglis, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 A.2d 10, 139 Conn. 387, 1953 Conn. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-danbury-v-falvo-conn-1953.