City of Dallas v. Holcomb

383 S.W.2d 585
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 14, 1964·No. No. A-10369·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. So that there may be no question as to the effect •of the foregoing order, we expressly approve the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals (381 S.W.2d 347) that the trial •court erred in refusing to permit full cross-examination of the witness, Joe Compton, concerning the award made by the board ■of special commissioners in condemnation of which he was a member.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Dallas v. Holcomb, 383 S.W.2d 585 (Tex. 1964).

383 S.W.2d 585 (City of Dallas v. Holcomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Schmidt
935 S.W.2d 520 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Davidson v. Great National Life Insurance
737 S.W.2d 312 (Texas Supreme Court, 1987)
Walker v. Ross
548 S.W.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
State v. Clara Hilton
412 S.W.2d 41 (Texas Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Hilton
405 S.W.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Warren v. Dikes
404 S.W.2d 946 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Martin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
388 S.W.2d 27 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1965)