City of Crowley v. Pic-A-Pak Grocery Corporation
This text of 274 So. 2d 767 (City of Crowley v. Pic-A-Pak Grocery Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITY OF CROWLEY, Louisiana, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PIC-A-PAK GROCERY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by Robert L. Cabes, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.
Joseph S. Gueno, Jr., Crowley, for plaintiff-appellee.
Pugh, Buatt, Landry & Pugh, by Lawrence G. Pugh, Jr., Crowley, for defendant-appellee.
Before FRUGE, HOOD and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.
HOOD, Judge.
This is an action instituted by the City of Crowley for judgment enjoining defendant, Pic-A-Pak Grocery Corporation, from violating the provisions of Ordinance No. 922 of that city relating to the dispensing of gasoline. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of plaintiff, granting it the relief which it sought. Defendant appealed.
This case was consolidated for trial and appeal with two other related cases, and we are rendering judgment in all of these cases on this date. See Hi-Lo Oil Company, et al., v. City of Crowley, Louisiana, La.App., 274 So.2d 757, and City of Crowley, Louisiana, v. Shop-Rite, Inc., La.App., 274 So.2d 768.
For the reasons which we assigned in the companion case of Hi-Lo Oil Company et al., v. City of Crowley, Louisiana, supra, the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to defendant-appellant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 So. 2d 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-crowley-v-pic-a-pak-grocery-corporation-lactapp-1973.