Home/Supreme Court/City of Coronado v. San Diego Unified Port Dist.

City of Coronado v. San Diego Unified Port Dist.

380 U.S. 125, 85 S. Ct. 806
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 1, 1965
Docket763
StatusPublished

This text of 380 U.S. 125 (City of Coronado v. San Diego Unified Port Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Coronado v. San Diego Unified Port Dist., 380 U.S. 125, 85 S. Ct. 806 (1965).

Opinion

380 U.S. 125 (1965)

CITY OF CORONADO ET AL.
v.
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ET AL.

No. 763.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 1, 1965.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT.

George A. Blackstone for appellants.

Aaron W. Reese and Burnham Enersen for San Diego Unified Port District et al., and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Ariel C. Hilton, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
380 U.S. 125, 85 S. Ct. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-coronado-v-san-diego-unified-port-dist-scotus-1965.