City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
108 N.E. 1091, 214 N.Y. 644, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1331
This text of 108 N.E. 1091 (City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 108 N.E. 1091, 214 N.Y. 644, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1331 (N.Y. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
*645 Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ. Dissenting: Seabury, J., on the ground that the entire structure between the two stone abutments constituted the framework of the bridge within the meaning of the statute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 N.E. 1091, 214 N.Y. 644, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-corning-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-ny-1915.