City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
108 N.E. 1091, 214 N.Y. 644, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1331
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
*645 Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ. Dissenting: Seabury, J., on the ground that the entire structure between the two stone abutments constituted the framework of the bridge within the meaning of the statute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 108 N.E. 1091, 214 N.Y. 644, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1331 (N.Y. 1915).
108 N.E. 1091 (City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.