City of Columbus v. Sims

20 S.E. 332, 94 Ga. 483, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 140
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 9, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 20 S.E. 332 (City of Columbus v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Columbus v. Sims, 20 S.E. 332, 94 Ga. 483, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 140 (Ga. 1894).

Opinion

Sims sued the city for injuries sustained by him by driving his buggy at night against a water-plug or hydrant in one of the streets. He claimed that the city had caused this plug to be placed in the roadway used for vehicles (the usual place for locating such plugs being in the center of the streets), and that there were no lights at or near the place and nothing to give warning of the location of the plug, he being ignorant of the same. He obtained-a verdict, and defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled. The material ground of the motion is, that the court erred in charging the jury thus: “The city having undertaken to light its streets, it was their duty, after they undertook to light that street, to have lighted the street in such a manner as parties could see any obstruction in the street.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Ruby
244 S.W.2d 491 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1951)
Hall v. City Council
174 S.E. 172 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Williams v. Mayor of Washington
82 S.E. 656 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
Evans v. City of Atlanta
77 S.E. 378 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
White v. City of New Bern
59 S.E. 992 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.E. 332, 94 Ga. 483, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-columbus-v-sims-ga-1894.