City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 42
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 18, 1964
DocketNo. 38051
StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 42 (City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 42 (Ohio 1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Permission to diminish passenger train service is within the sound discretion of the commission, and this court will not interfere with that discretion unless there has been an abuse thereof.

Much evidence was offered before the board, some of which is conflicting. In such a case, it is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the board on factual issues, but only to determine from an examination of the record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful. Fouss v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 171 Ohio St., 226.

Prom an examination of the record in this case, this court is of the opinion that the order of the board is neither unreasonable nor unlawful. The order is, therefore, affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Tart, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Grieeith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-columbus-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1964.