City of Columbus v. Cardwell, 07ap-519 (8-9-2007)
This text of 2007 Ohio 4520 (City of Columbus v. Cardwell, 07ap-519 (8-9-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} On June 21, 2007, the office of the Franklin County Public Defender filed a motion for leave to appeal. The city of Columbus, who prosecuted the case, was not served a copy of the motion. Instead, a copy was sent to the office of the Franklin County *Page 2 Prosecuting Attorney. App.R. 5(A) places the duty of serving the motion upon the clerk for the court of appeals.
{¶ 3} The motion references an affidavit which has not been provided and an explanation as to why this appeal was not timely filed. Such an affidavit is not required by App.R. 5(A).
{¶ 4} Counsel on behalf of appellant has indicated that "the paperwork was not timely processed and docketed within the Public Defender office," which resulted in the appeal not being filed on time. Because the motion was filed only 20 days late and the mistakes which have been made are the mistakes of appointed appellate counsel, not the appellant, the motion is sustained.
Motion for leave to appeal granted.
*Page 1BROWN and McGRATH, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2007 Ohio 4520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-columbus-v-cardwell-07ap-519-8-9-2007-ohioctapp-2007.