City of Columbia v. Smith
89 S.E. 1028, 105 S.C. 348, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 230
Opinion
September 14, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed. *Page 364
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Columbia v. Smith, 89 S.E. 1028, 105 S.C. 348, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 230 (S.C. 1916).
89 S.E. 1028 (City of Columbia v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Board of Trustees v. State
761 S.E.2d 241 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2014)
Horry County v. Horry County Higher Education Commission
412 S.E.2d 421 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)
Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Commission
326 S.E.2d 395 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Mills Mill v. Hawkins
103 S.E.2d 14 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Fordham v. Fordham
76 S.E.2d 299 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)
Glymph v. Smith, Comptroller
170 S.E. 913 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1933)
Gillespie v. Blackwell
161 S.E. 869 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Briggs v. Greenville County
135 S.E. 153 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
Sullivan v. City Council of Charleston
130 S.E. 876 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)
Battle v. Willcox
122 S.E. 516 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)