City of Cleveland v. Texas Company
This text of 1957 OK 307 (City of Cleveland v. Texas Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A motion to dismiss has been filed by the defendant in error for the reason that the appeal was not filed in this court within the time provided by law.
This case was consolidated in the trial court with City of Cleveland, Oklahoma v. Hambright, Okl., 320 P.2d 388 in which case motion to dismiss was sustained this date.
In each case the facts and various times relevant to the order overruling motion for new trial, extensions of time in which to make and serve case-made and the date of the filing of the appeal in this court are identical. The appeal was not filed in this court until after the expiration of three months from the order overruling motion for new trial. No extension of time within which to file the appeal was granted though there was an extension of time to make and serve case-made extending beyond the three months period, and the appeal was filed herein within such extended period of time.
Under the rule announced in Adams v. Hobbs, 204 Okl. 85, 226 P.2d 913, this extension of time to make and serve case-made did not extend the time in which to file the appeal in this court. The appeal, therefore, was not filed in time.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1957 OK 307, 320 P.2d 392, 1957 Okla. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-cleveland-v-texas-company-okla-1957.