City of Cleveland v. Perk
207 N.E.2d 556, 2 Ohio St. 2d 173, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 323, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 518
Opinion
Because of the lease to a private corporation for profit, the subject property has lost its identity as public property used exclusively for a public purpose within the meaning of Section 5709.08 Revised Code, and is not entitled to exemption from taxation. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed on authority of Carney, Aud., v. City of Cleveland, 173 Ohio St. 56.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Cleveland v. Perk, 207 N.E.2d 556, 2 Ohio St. 2d 173, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 323, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 518 (Ohio 1965).
207 N.E.2d 556 (City of Cleveland v. Perk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitehouse v. Tracy
1995 Ohio 212 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Village of Whitehouse v. Tracy
72 Ohio St. 3d 178 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Harrisburg-Raleigh Airport Authority v. Department of Revenue
533 N.E.2d 1072 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1989)
City of Cleveland v. Perk
280 N.E.2d 653 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)
Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. Walton
257 N.E.2d 392 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)
Graf v. Warren
225 N.E.2d 262 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1967)