City of Cleveland v. McCluskey

Sixth Circuit

City of Cleveland v. McCluskey

153 F.2d 613

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 25, 1946

DocketNo. 10134

StatusPublished

This text of 153 F.2d 613 (City of Cleveland v. McCluskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Cleveland v. McCluskey, 153 F.2d 613 (6th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that there was no reversible error in the order of the District Court entered August 1, 1945, approving and affirming the report and order of the Special Master filed February 23, 1945, denying and dismissing the reclamation petition of appellant filed October 9, 1944, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that there was no reversible error in the order of the District Court entered August 1, 1945, approving and affirming the report and order of the Special Master filed February 23, 1945, denying and dismissing the reclamation petition of appellant filed October 9, 1944, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 F.2d 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-cleveland-v-mccluskey-ca6-1946.