City of Cleveland v. McCluskey

Sixth Circuit

City of Cleveland v. McCluskey

153 F.2d 613

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 25, 1946·No. No. 10134·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that there was no reversible error in the order of the District Court entered August 1, 1945, approving and affirming the report and order of the Special Master filed February 23, 1945, denying and dismissing the reclamation petition of appellant filed October 9, 1944, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that there was no reversible error in the order of the District Court entered August 1, 1945, approving and affirming the report and order of the Special Master filed February 23, 1945, denying and dismissing the reclamation petition of appellant filed October 9, 1944, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed.

City of Cleveland v. McCluskey, 153 F.2d 613 (6th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

153 F.2d 613 (City of Cleveland v. McCluskey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.