Home/Ohio Supreme Court/City of Cleveland v. Destiny Ventures, L.L.C.

City of Cleveland v. Destiny Ventures, L.L.C.

2010 Ohio 2320, 929 N.E.2d 1038, 125 Ohio St. 3d 540
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 26, 2010
Docket2008-2230
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2010 Ohio 2320 (City of Cleveland v. Destiny Ventures, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Cleveland v. Destiny Ventures, L.L.C., 2010 Ohio 2320, 929 N.E.2d 1038, 125 Ohio St. 3d 540 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Cleveland v. Washington Mut. Bank, 125 Ohio St.3d 541, 2010-Ohio-2219, — N.E.2d-, 2010 WL 2134307, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with Cleveland v. Washington Mut. Bank.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., not participating. *541 John P. Curp, Cincinnati City Solicitor, Ernest F. McAdams Jr., City Prosecuting Attorney, and Keith C. Forman, Assistant City Prosecuting Attorney, urging affirmance for amicus curiae city of Cincinnati.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Homesales, Inc.
941 N.E.2d 1271 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2010 Ohio 2320, 929 N.E.2d 1038, 125 Ohio St. 3d 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-cleveland-v-destiny-ventures-llc-ohio-2010.