City of Clearwater v. United States Steel Corp.

462 So. 2d 1171, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 91, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16250
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 1984·No. No. 84-391·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, City of Clearwater, Florida, appeals from an order denying its motion for relief from summary judgment. We affirm.

In 1979, the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County, Florida, entered a summary judgment determining that the City of Clearwater was bound by a contract of annexation between it and appellee’s predecessor in interest. The summary judgment enjoined the city from enforcing an ordinance that would rezone property belonging to appellee, United States Steel. This court affirmed that summary judgment on March 5, 1980.

On January 24,1984, the appellant filed a motion for relief from summary judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). The appellant sought relief from the summary judgment on the grounds that the judgment was void, prospective application of the judgment was no longer equitable, and equity commanded relief from the final summary judgment. This motion was denied and a timely notice of appeal was filed.

We find that the court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for relief from the summary judgment on the particular grounds set forth in appellant’s motion and therefore affirm.

SCHEB, A.C.J., SCHOONOVER, J., and BENTLEY, E. Randolph, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Clearwater v. United States Steel Corp., 462 So. 2d 1171, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 91, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16250 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

462 So. 2d 1171 (City of Clearwater v. United States Steel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Clearwater v. US Steel Corp.
469 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)