City of Clarksville v. Jenks

486 S.W.3d 383, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1312, 2015 WL 8797988
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 15, 2015
DocketNo. ED 102659
StatusPublished

This text of 486 S.W.3d 383 (City of Clarksville v. Jenks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Clarksville v. Jenks, 486 S.W.3d 383, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1312, 2015 WL 8797988 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Margaret Jenks (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to § 523.256 RSMo (2006). In a single point on appeal, Appellant argues that the general rule of civil procedure for voluntary dismissal, Rule 67.02, does not apply to condemnation proceedings. In the alternative, Appellant argues that voluntary dismissal does not divest the trial court of jurisdic[384]*384tion over a motion filed pursuant to § 523.256 because the statute mandates a determination of whether the condemning authorities engaged in good faith negotiations. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
486 S.W.3d 383, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1312, 2015 WL 8797988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-clarksville-v-jenks-moctapp-2015.