City of Clarksdale v. Williamson

Fifth Circuit

City of Clarksdale v. Williamson

194 F. 412, 114 C.C.A. 374, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1183

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1912

DocketNo. 2,243

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 194 F. 412 (City of Clarksdale v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Clarksdale v. Williamson, 194 F. 412, 114 C.C.A. 374, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1183 (5th Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The right of trial by jury was waived by stipulation in writing, and the court, on the facts, rendered judgment for the plaintiffs (defendants in error here). The facts disclosed by the record fully sustain the judgment. None of the assignments of error are well taken, and the judgment must be affirmed.

The judgment was for money not otherwise secured, and, on suing out the writ, a supersedeas bond was given under rule 13 of this court (150 Fed. xxviii, 79 C. C. A. xxviii). R. S. U. S. § 1000 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 712). The defendants in error in the brief request the court to enter judgment here on the supersedeas bond. The practice heretofore prevailing has been to enter such judgment on the bond on motion in the trial court, after the mandate goes down from this court. Gordon v. Third National Bank, 56 Fed. 790, 6 C. C. A. 125. We see no reason in this case for departing from the usual course.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The right of trial by jury was waived by stipulation in writing, and the court, on the facts, rendered judgment for the plaintiffs (defendants in error here). The facts disclosed by the record fully sustain the judgment. None of the assignments of error are well taken, and the judgment must be affirmed.

The judgment was for money not otherwise secured, and, on suing out the writ, a supersedeas bond was given under rule 13 of this court (150 Fed. xxviii, 79 C. C. A. xxviii). R. S. U. S. § 1000 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 712). The defendants in error in the brief request the court to enter judgment here on the supersedeas bond. The practice heretofore prevailing has been to enter such judgment on the bond on motion in the trial court, after the mandate goes down from this court. Gordon v. Third National Bank, 56 Fed. 790, 6 C. C. A. 125. We see no reason in this case for departing from the usual course.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 F. 412, 114 C.C.A. 374, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-clarksdale-v-williamson-ca5-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack