City of Cincinnati v. Interurban Railway & Terminal Co.

89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 469
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 17, 1914
DocketNo. 14165
StatusPublished

This text of 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 469 (City of Cincinnati v. Interurban Railway & Terminal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Cincinnati v. Interurban Railway & Terminal Co., 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 469 (Ohio 1914).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., dissents. Nichols, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-cincinnati-v-interurban-railway-terminal-co-ohio-1914.