City of Cincinnati v. Hanke Bros.

Ohio Supreme Court

City of Cincinnati v. Hanke Bros.

186 N.E. 98, 125 Ohio St. 639, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 639, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 258

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 8, 1932

Docket23570

StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.E. 98 (City of Cincinnati v. Hanke Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Cincinnati v. Hanke Bros., 186 N.E. 98, 125 Ohio St. 639, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 639, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 258 (Ohio 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

*640 It appearing that the Judges of the Court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one Judge not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of this fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*640 It appearing that the Judges of the Court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one Judge not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of this fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.E. 98, 125 Ohio St. 639, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 639, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-cincinnati-v-hanke-bros-ohio-1932.