Home/Ohio Supreme Court/City of Cincinnati v. Berry

City of Cincinnati v. Berry

296 N.E.2d 532, 34 Ohio St. 2d 106, 63 Ohio Op. 2d 192, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 355
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 16, 1973
DocketNos. 72-679 and 72-680
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 296 N.E.2d 532 (City of Cincinnati v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Cincinnati v. Berry, 296 N.E.2d 532, 34 Ohio St. 2d 106, 63 Ohio Op. 2d 192, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 355 (Ohio 1973).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

A majority of the members of the court are of the opinion that since Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972), 407 U. S. 25, 32 L. Ed. 2d 530, does not announce a proposition of law formulated by this court,1 but is rather the latest of a “widening class of cases”2 from the United States [108]*108Supreme Court prescribing new federal constitutional requirements, it would be improvident for us to declare the case to have retroactive effect in Ohio in the absence of any indication that the United States Supreme Court intends it to be so applied.3

The judgments of the Court of Appeals are affirmed,

Judgments affirmed.

Herbert, Corrigan, Ceeebrezze and P. Brown, JJ., concur. 0 ’Neill, C. J., Stern and W. Brown, JJ., dissent..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Calhoun
350 N.E.2d 665 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. Sanchez
516 P.2d 1226 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1973)
Berry v. City of Cincinnati
414 U.S. 29 (Supreme Court, 1973)
City of New Orleans v. Harris
283 So. 2d 207 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 N.E.2d 532, 34 Ohio St. 2d 106, 63 Ohio Op. 2d 192, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-cincinnati-v-berry-ohio-1973.