City of Cincinnati v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Rd.

92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 510
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1915
DocketNo. 14402
StatusPublished

This text of 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 510 (City of Cincinnati v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Rd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Cincinnati v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Rd., 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 510 (Ohio 1915).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Wan am aker, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-cincinnati-v-baltimore-ohio-southwestern-rd-ohio-1915.