City of Chicago v. Zitny

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Chicago v. Zitny

199 Ill. App. 585

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 19, 1916

DocketGen. No. 22,188

StatusPublished

This text of 199 Ill. App. 585 (City of Chicago v. Zitny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Chicago v. Zitny, 199 Ill. App. 585 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Evidence, § 10*—judicial notice of ordinance. A trial court must take judicial notice of a municipal ordinance. 2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 39 *^when presumed that ordinance violated as charged in complaint. It will be presumed on appeal from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance, where such ordinance is not found in the record, that it was proven to have been violated as charged in the complaint. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 39*—when finding of trial judge in prosecution for violation of ordinance not disturbed. The finding of a trial judge in a prosecution for the violation of a municipal ordinance will not be disturbed as against the weight of evidence where it appears that his finding is sustained by credible evidence appearing in the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Evidence, § 10*—judicial notice of ordinance. A trial court must take judicial notice of a municipal ordinance. 2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 39 *^when presumed that ordinance violated as charged in complaint. It will be presumed on appeal from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance, where such ordinance is not found in the record, that it was proven to have been violated as charged in the complaint. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 39*—when finding of trial judge in prosecution for violation of ordinance not disturbed. The finding of a trial judge in a prosecution for the violation of a municipal ordinance will not be disturbed as against the weight of evidence where it appears that his finding is sustained by credible evidence appearing in the record.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 Ill. App. 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chicago-v-zitny-illappct-1916.