City of Chicago v. Walsh

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Chicago v. Walsh

207 Ill. App. 50

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 27, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,146

StatusPublished

This text of 207 Ill. App. 50 (City of Chicago v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Chicago v. Walsh, 207 Ill. App. 50 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal corporations, § 864* — when evidence sufficient to sustain conviction for violation of gambling ordinance. On a prosecution for violation of the Chicago Code of 1911, sec. 982, in reference to gambling, evidence held to support a judgment against defendant. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 14* — what judicially noticed by. The Municipal Court of Chicago takes judicial notice of the ordinances of the City of Chicago. 4. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 28* — when ordinance must be certified. The trial judge, in an action in the Municipal Court of Chicago, is required, upon the request of the party appealing, to certify the ordinance or ordinances material to the issues. 5. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29* — when presumed that complaint donformed to ordinance. On an appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago, where the ordinance material to the issue is not certified by the trial court, every presumption that the complaint thereunder conformed to the ordinance will be indulged in favor of the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal corporations, § 864* — when evidence sufficient to sustain conviction for violation of gambling ordinance. On a prosecution for violation of the Chicago Code of 1911, sec. 982, in reference to gambling, evidence held to support a judgment against defendant. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 14* — what judicially noticed by. The Municipal Court of Chicago takes judicial notice of the ordinances of the City of Chicago. 4. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 28* — when ordinance must be certified. The trial judge, in an action in the Municipal Court of Chicago, is required, upon the request of the party appealing, to certify the ordinance or ordinances material to the issues. 5. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29* — when presumed that complaint donformed to ordinance. On an appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago, where the ordinance material to the issue is not certified by the trial court, every presumption that the complaint thereunder conformed to the ordinance will be indulged in favor of the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 Ill. App. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chicago-v-walsh-illappct-1917.