City of Chicago v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Chicago v. Smith

203 Ill. App. 202

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 8, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,532·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Mo Surely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29*—when presumed that evidence was sufficient to justify finding of court as to keeping of common gaming house. Where an ordinance upon which a prosecution for keeping a common gaming house was not preserved in the record, it must be presumed on appeal that the evidence was sufficient to justify a finding of the trial court that defendant was guilty of keeping a common gaming house.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Mo Surely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29*—when presumed that evidence was sufficient to justify finding of court as to keeping of common gaming house. Where an ordinance upon which a prosecution for keeping a common gaming house was not preserved in the record, it must be presumed on appeal that the evidence was sufficient to justify a finding of the trial court that defendant was guilty of keeping a common gaming house.

City of Chicago v. Smith, 203 Ill. App. 202 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

203 Ill. App. 202 (City of Chicago v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.