Home/Supreme Court/City of Chicago v. Shakman

City of Chicago v. Shakman

429 U.S. 858, 97 S. Ct. 156
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 4, 1976
DocketNo. 76-14
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 429 U.S. 858 (City of Chicago v. Shakman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Chicago v. Shakman, 429 U.S. 858, 97 S. Ct. 156 (1976).

Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Tabor
583 B.R. 155 (N.D. Illinois, 2018)
In Re Snider Farms, Inc.
125 B.R. 993 (N.D. Indiana, 1991)
People v. Batey
183 Cal. App. 3d 1281 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
Major v. Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.
496 F. Supp. 604 (E.D. Virginia, 1980)
United States v. Asay
614 F.2d 655 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
United States of America and James T. Caffey, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Clifford H. Asay, Jr., an Accountancy Corporation, and Clifford H. Asay, Jr., as President of Clifford H. Asay, Jr., an Accountancy Corporation, and Arnold L. Kimmes William B. Feinberg M & G Amusement Company Cavalier Mobile Estates, Inc. And Mortco Financing, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees. United States of America and James T. Caffey, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Clifford H. Asay, Jr., an Accounting Corporation, and Clifford H. Asay, Jr., as President of Clifford H. Asay, Jr., an Accountancy Corporation, Respondents- and Arnold L. Kimmes William B. Feinberg M & G Amusement Company Cavalier Mobile Estates, Inc. And Mortco Financing, Inc., Intervenors
614 F.2d 655 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 U.S. 858, 97 S. Ct. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chicago-v-shakman-scotus-1976.