City of Chicago v. Shakman

429 U.S. 858, 97 S. Ct. 156

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 4, 1976·No. No. 76-14·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Chicago v. Shakman, 429 U.S. 858, 97 S. Ct. 156 (1976).

Pincite

429 U.S. 858 (City of Chicago v. Shakman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

583 B.R. 155 (N.D. Illinois, 2018)

In Re Snider Farms, Inc.

125 B.R. 993 (N.D. Indiana, 1991)

People v. Batey

183 Cal. App. 3d 1281 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)

Major v. Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.

496 F. Supp. 604 (E.D. Virginia, 1980)

United States v. Asay

614 F.2d 655 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)

United States of America and James T. Caffey, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Clifford H. Asay, Jr., an Accountancy Corporation, and Clifford H. Asay, Jr., as President of Clifford H. Asay, Jr., an Accountancy Corporation, and Arnold L. Kimmes William B. Feinberg M & G Amusement Company Cavalier Mobile Estates, Inc. And Mortco Financing, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees. United States of America and James T. Caffey, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Clifford H. Asay, Jr., an Accounting Corporation, and Clifford H. Asay, Jr., as President of Clifford H. Asay, Jr., an Accountancy Corporation, Respondents- and Arnold L. Kimmes William B. Feinberg M & G Amusement Company Cavalier Mobile Estates, Inc. And Mortco Financing, Inc., Intervenors

614 F.2d 655 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)