City of Chicago v. Jones

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Chicago v. Jones

203 Ill. App. 203

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 8, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,533

StatusPublished

This text of 203 Ill. App. 203 (City of Chicago v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Chicago v. Jones, 203 Ill. App. 203 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Me Surely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29*—what Appellate Court may not take judicial notice of. The Appellate Court cannotz take judicial notice of a city ordinance upon which a prosecution by the city is based where such ordinance is not preserved in the record. 2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29*—when presumed that trial court is justified in finding defendant guilty for violation of city ordinance. Where a city ordinance upon which a prosecution for gambling is based is not preserved in the record, it must he presumed on appeal that the trial court was justified in its finding that the defendant was guilty of engaging in gambling in violation of such ordinance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Me Surely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29*—what Appellate Court may not take judicial notice of. The Appellate Court cannotz take judicial notice of a city ordinance upon which a prosecution by the city is based where such ordinance is not preserved in the record. 2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29*—when presumed that trial court is justified in finding defendant guilty for violation of city ordinance. Where a city ordinance upon which a prosecution for gambling is based is not preserved in the record, it must he presumed on appeal that the trial court was justified in its finding that the defendant was guilty of engaging in gambling in violation of such ordinance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 Ill. App. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chicago-v-jones-illappct-1917.