City of Chicago v. Jacobi

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Chicago v. Jacobi

197 Ill. App. 493

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 17, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,510

StatusPublished

This text of 197 Ill. App. 493 (City of Chicago v. Jacobi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Chicago v. Jacobi, 197 Ill. App. 493 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Appeal and error, § 822*—when rulings on motions must he preserved in hill of exceptions. In order to preserve for review the rulings of the trial court on motions, the evidence of such rulings must be preserved in a bill of exceptions, and it is not sufficient that the rulings are copied into the statutory record. 2. Appeal and error, § 824*—when exceptions to rulings of trial court not part of record. Exceptions to the rulings of the trial court which appear in the record but are not preserved by the bill of exceptions are not a part of the record, and the errors assigned thereon cannot be considered on review. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 28*—how rulings on petition for change of venue must he preserved for review. The rulings of the Municipal Court on a petition for a change of venue are not before the Appellate Court unless the petition and rulings thereon appear either by a bill of exceptions, stenographic report or a statement of facts as provided by section 23 of the Municipal Court Act (J. & A. H 3335). 4. Appeal and error, § 1751*—when judgment affirmed on writ of error. On a writ of error where the questions sought to be presented are not preserved in such manner that they can be reviewed by the Appellate Court, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Appeal and error, § 822*—when rulings on motions must he preserved in hill of exceptions. In order to preserve for review the rulings of the trial court on motions, the evidence of such rulings must be preserved in a bill of exceptions, and it is not sufficient that the rulings are copied into the statutory record. 2. Appeal and error, § 824*—when exceptions to rulings of trial court not part of record. Exceptions to the rulings of the trial court which appear in the record but are not preserved by the bill of exceptions are not a part of the record, and the errors assigned thereon cannot be considered on review. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 28*—how rulings on petition for change of venue must he preserved for review. The rulings of the Municipal Court on a petition for a change of venue are not before the Appellate Court unless the petition and rulings thereon appear either by a bill of exceptions, stenographic report or a statement of facts as provided by section 23 of the Municipal Court Act (J. & A. H 3335). 4. Appeal and error, § 1751*—when judgment affirmed on writ of error. On a writ of error where the questions sought to be presented are not preserved in such manner that they can be reviewed by the Appellate Court, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 Ill. App. 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chicago-v-jacobi-illappct-1916.