City of Chicago v. Gillen

78 N.E. 13, 222 Ill. 112
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided June 14, 1906·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The two controlling questions in this case, namely, the jurisdiction of the court and the waiver of notice by appellee, are conclusively settled by the case of Powell v. Bullis, 221 Ill. 379. The record filed as a return to the writ fails to show that appellee was notified of the charges against him or in any way waived such notice. The trial board and civil service commission, in the absence of such notice, were without authority to hear or determine the charges, and the judgment must be affirmed notwithstanding the other questions urged by appellants.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Chicago v. Gillen, 78 N.E. 13, 222 Ill. 112 (Ill. 1906).

78 N.E. 13 (City of Chicago v. Gillen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rusignuolo v. Orechio
360 A.2d 326 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)
Russ v. Board of Education of Brunswick County
59 S.E.2d 589 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Foster v. Hindley
131 P. 197 (Washington Supreme Court, 1913)
Gillen v. City of Chicago
177 Ill. App. 318 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1913)