City of Chicago v. Chicago National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Chicago v. Chicago National Bank

288 N.E.2d 611, 7 Ill. App. 3d 1011

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedSeptember 29, 1972

DocketNo. 54503

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 N.E.2d 611 (City of Chicago v. Chicago National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Chicago v. Chicago National Bank, 288 N.E.2d 611, 7 Ill. App. 3d 1011 (Ill. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. JUSTICE ENGLISH

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is another of a number of suits brought by the City to require the former and present owners of a building to reconstruct it so as to cause its compliance with the Chicago Zoning Ordinance. The former owner had been granted a building permit but had not complied with its terms, thus producing the zoning violations. The defendants presented no evidence. The trial court denied the relief sought and while a fine was imposed upon the former owner-builder, the City’s Notice of Appeal is from the decree in its entirety. Defendants have not appeared in this court.

Only the parties and property are different from those in the case of City of Chicago v. Exchange National Bank, 51 Ill.2d 543, 283 N.E.2d 878, the issue being identical in that case and determinative of the result in this case. See also City of Chicago v. Vella, ante, 1009.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to grant the relief sought in the complaint.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

LORENZ, P. J., and DRUCKER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. JUSTICE ENGLISH

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is another of a number of suits brought by the City to require the former and present owners of a building to reconstruct it so as to cause its compliance with the Chicago Zoning Ordinance. The former owner had been granted a building permit but had not complied with its terms, thus producing the zoning violations. The defendants presented no evidence. The trial court denied the relief sought and while a fine was imposed upon the former owner-builder, the City’s Notice of Appeal is from the decree in its entirety. Defendants have not appeared in this court.

Only the parties and property are different from those in the case of City of Chicago v. Exchange National Bank, 51 Ill.2d 543, 283 N.E.2d 878, the issue being identical in that case and determinative of the result in this case. See also City of Chicago v. Vella, ante, 1009.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to grant the relief sought in the complaint.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

LORENZ, P. J., and DRUCKER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 N.E.2d 611, 7 Ill. App. 3d 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chicago-v-chicago-national-bank-illappct-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack