City of Chicago v. Case

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Chicago v. Case

26 Ill. App. 654, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 328

DecidedMay 31, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ill. App. 654 (City of Chicago v. Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Chicago v. Case, 26 Ill. App. 654, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 328 (Ill. Ct. App. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Bailey, J.

This is an action of debt, brought by the city of Chicago against Charles H. Case, for the collection of the penalty imposed by an ordinance of the city in relation to foreign insurance companies. The facts are identical with those in the case of the City of Chicago v. The Phcenix Insurance Company, except that in this case the defendant is charged as an agent effecting insurance within said city for said insurance company, said company not having a license as required, by said ordinance. In this case judgment was rendered for the defendant on demurrer to the declaration, and upon the principles decided in the case against the Phoenix Insurance Company, said judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey, J.

This is an action of debt, brought by the city of Chicago against Charles H. Case, for the collection of the penalty imposed by an ordinance of the city in relation to foreign insurance companies. The facts are identical with those in the case of the City of Chicago v. The Phcenix Insurance Company, except that in this case the defendant is charged as an agent effecting insurance within said city for said insurance company, said company not having a license as required, by said ordinance. In this case judgment was rendered for the defendant on demurrer to the declaration, and upon the principles decided in the case against the Phoenix Insurance Company, said judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Ill. App. 654, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chicago-v-case-illappct-1888.