City of Chester v. Porter
This text of 47 Ill. 66 (City of Chester v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the 'lourt:
This is an action brought against the City of Chester, to recover damages for injuries received by a child from an ox team and cart, at work upon the streets in the employment of the city. The case is based on the idea that the accident was attributable to the carelessness of the driver. It was left to the jury, on that issue, and they found a verdict for the plaintiff. We have examined the record in vain to discover evidence upon which this verdict can be sustained. There is none, and the counsel of appellee points out no act, either done or omitted by the driver, which he can claim to be censurable. The oxen were going down a steep grade, moving somewhat rapidly, and the child, which was not three years old, and ought not to have been permitted in the street by itselfj ran under their feet, or under the wheel, and was injured. We are obliged to direct that the case be submitted to another jury.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 Ill. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chester-v-porter-ill-1868.