City of Chelsea v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

384 N.E.2d 237, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 974
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided January 17, 1979·Published

Opinion

As it is clear from the memorandum filed by the judge that the orders of remand to the commission which are found in the "Judgments” which were entered on September 1,1977, are purely interlocutory in nature, the appeals from those orders must be dismissed. See and compare Marlborough Hosp. v. Commissioner of Pub. Welfare, 346 Mass. 737, 738 (1964); Metropolitan Dist. Commn. v. Department of Pub. Util., 352 Mass. 18, 30 (1967); Roberts-Haverhill Associates v. City Council of Haverhill, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 715,719-720 (1974). Contrast Massachusetts Gen. Hosp. v. Commissioner of Pub. Welfare, 347 Mass. 24, 29 N.4 (1964).

Appeals dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Chelsea v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 384 N.E.2d 237, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 974 (Mass. Ct. App. 1979).

384 N.E.2d 237 (City of Chelsea v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts-Haverhill v. City Coun. of Haverhill
319 N.E.2d 916 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)
Metropolitan District Commission v. Department of Public Utilities
224 N.E.2d 502 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1967)
Marlborough Hospital v. Commissioner of Public Welfare
196 N.E.2d 199 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1964)
Massachusetts General Hospital v. Commissioner of Public Welfare
196 N.E.2d 214 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1964)