City of Charlotte v. University Financial Properties, LLC

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 28, 2020
Docket183PA16-2
StatusPublished

This text of City of Charlotte v. University Financial Properties, LLC (City of Charlotte v. University Financial Properties, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Charlotte v. University Financial Properties, LLC, (N.C. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 183PA16-2

Filed 28 February 2020

THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE, A North Carolina Municipal Corporation

v.

UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC, a North Carolina Limited Liability Company f/k/a/ University Bank Properties Limited Partnership; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. f/k/a NCNB National Bank of North Carolina, Tenant; and Any Other Parties in Interest

On discretionary review under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the

Court of Appeals, 818 S.E.2d 116 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018), reversing an order entered on

29 September 2016 by Judge Daniel A. Kuehnert in Superior Court, Mecklenburg

County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 1 October 2019 in session in the Randolph

County 1909 Historic County Courthouse in the City of Asheboro pursuant to section

18B.8 of Session Law 2017-57.

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, by Charles C. Meeker and DeWitt F. McCarley, for plaintiff-appellant.

Johnston, Allison & Hord, P.A., by R. Susanne Todd, Martin L. White, and David V. Brennan, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Justice DAVIS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting

to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. CITY OF CHARLOTTE V. UNIV. FIN. PROPERTIES

Opinion of the Court

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands

without precedential value. See Piro v. McKeever, 369 N.C. 291, 291, 794 S.E.2d 501,

501 (2016) (per curiam) (affirming a Court of Appeals opinion without precedential

value by an equally divided vote).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Piro v. McKeever
794 S.E.2d 501 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2016)
City of Charlotte v. Univ. Fin. Props., LLC
818 S.E.2d 116 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
City of Charlotte v. University Financial Properties, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-charlotte-v-university-financial-properties-llc-nc-2020.