City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston
This text of City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston (City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
City of Charleston, Petitioner,
v.
City of North Charleston and Millbrook Plantation, LLC, Respondents.
Appellate Case No. 2023-000778
Appeal from Charleston County Eugene C. Griffith Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 28311 Heard April 1, 2025 – Filed January 21, 2026
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Frances Isaac Cantwell, of City of Charleston Legal Department; Julia Parker Copeland, formerly of City of Charleston Legal Department; Wilbur E. Johnson and Russell Grainger Hines, of Clement Rivers, LLP, all of Charleston, all for City of Charleston.
Bruce E. Miller, of Bruce E. Miller, P.A., of Mount Pleasant, for Millbrook Plantation, LLC; David J. Parrish, of Maynard Nexsen PC, of Charleston; and Kriston D. Neely, of North Charleston, both for City of North Charleston. PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston, 439 S.C. 6, 885 S.E.2d 151 (Ct. App. 2023). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
KITTREDGE, C.J., FEW, JAMES, HILL and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-charleston-v-city-of-north-charleston-sc-2026.