City of Cape May v. United States

Court of Claims

City of Cape May v. United States

64 Ct. Cl. 407, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 561, 1928 WL 3049

United States Court of Claims·Decided January 9, 1928·No. No. E-618·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Moss,'Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The sole question to be determined in this case is the .fair and reasonable market value on December 2, 1918, of the property taken by the Government. The court has found such value to be $20-,150.

Plaintiff claims, amongst other items set forth in its petition, the right to recover as a part of its just compensation, a large sum as representing potential revenue based on taxes to be derived from the property taken. A claim of [413] this nature does npt constitute a proper element for consideration in arriving at just compensation.

Ghaham, Judge; Booth, Judge; and Campbell, Chief, Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moss,'Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The sole question to be determined in this case is the .fair and reasonable market value on December 2, 1918, of the property taken by the Government. The court has found such value to be $20-,150.

Plaintiff claims, amongst other items set forth in its petition, the right to recover as a part of its just compensation, a large sum as representing potential revenue based on taxes to be derived from the property taken. A claim of [413] this nature does npt constitute a proper element for consideration in arriving at just compensation.

Ghaham, Judge; Booth, Judge; and Campbell, Chief, Justice, concur.

City of Cape May v. United States, 64 Ct. Cl. 407, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 561, 1928 WL 3049 (cc 1928).

Pincite

64 Ct. Cl. 407 (City of Cape May v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related