City of Butte v. Call

Montana Supreme Court

City of Butte v. Call

57 P. 726, 23 Mont. 94, 1899 Mont. LEXIS 83

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 3, 1899

DocketNo 1,410

StatusPublished

This text of 57 P. 726 (City of Butte v. Call) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Butte v. Call, 57 P. 726, 23 Mont. 94, 1899 Mont. LEXIS 83 (Mo. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— The record in this case shows that the defendant was tried in the police court of the city of Butte, Silver Bow county, on a charge of violating Section 16 of Ordinance 471 of said city of Butte, entitled, ‘ An ordinance providing for the payment of licenses to the city of Butte, and repealing Ordinances Nos. 93, 342, 549, 373, 404 and 453.” He was adjudged guilty as chax*ged, and sentenced to pay a fine. From this * judgment he appealed to the District Court in and for said county, and upon another trial had therein, on May 16, 1898, he was again found guilty, and judgment for a fine entered against him. The record, however, contains no copy of the notice of appeal given, as provided by Section 2281 of the Penal Code. This Court is therefore without jurisdiction to review any question presented therein. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

— The record in this case shows that the defendant was tried in the police court of the city of Butte, Silver Bow county, on a charge of violating Section 16 of Ordinance 471 of said city of Butte, entitled, ‘ An ordinance providing for the payment of licenses to the city of Butte, and repealing Ordinances Nos. 93, 342, 549, 373, 404 and 453.” He was adjudged guilty as chax*ged, and sentenced to pay a fine. From this * judgment he appealed to the District Court in and for said county, and upon another trial had therein, on May 16, 1898, he was again found guilty, and judgment for a fine entered against him. The record, however, contains no copy of the notice of appeal given, as provided by Section 2281 of the Penal Code. This Court is therefore without jurisdiction to review any question presented therein. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 P. 726, 23 Mont. 94, 1899 Mont. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-butte-v-call-mont-1899.